<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://tuapse.com/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0">
        <title>Аудио-википедия</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://tuapse.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 14:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>Supravox</title>
            <link>http://tuapse.com/doku.php/5speakers/4dyn/supr</link>
            <description>Supravox

динамики

&lt;https://www.supravox.fr/categorie-produit/haut-parleurs/serie-classique/&gt;


165 GMF



285 GMF





&lt;https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/340786-1-cd-seos-supravox.html&gt;



&lt;https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/321786-supravox-165-alnico-vs-exc-ob.html&gt;

Hi again, I've listened extensively the GMF and Alnico versions.

The Alnico version had a very weak magnet (2.3BL) with more than 1Q in comparison to my GMF pair with 0.5Q.

The Alnico clearly won the subjective …</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>динамики</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
